No religion should be allowed to control anyone except its followers inside of a democracy. Also, every religion should have to pay for the loss of control by every one of its followers.

Religion Rights and Responsibilities

The Muslim Option

Basic personal rights are supposed to exist in most nations today, at least the industrialized ones. However, some groups are beginning to test their abilities to control certain basic rights knowing that if they were to win they could change this fundamental democratic concept to the point that personal rights would die in some nations which currently have them but the majority are willing to give them up. Well, the time has come for the nations of this world who advocate real freedom, found via one's unquestionable personal rights, to hold the people who are opposed to these rights, and are at the same time residents of the nations which advocate these rights, to be held responsible for both their personal and group decisions when they harm the others. Again, the concept of individual rights based upon certain limitations has been around for some time and is even excessive to the degree that an individual cannot even make the choice to harm themselves, but that is another issue which will be dealt with accordingly. But here we are dealing with group based decisions which harm the rights of others who do not want to be a committed part of the same group. Typically within certain religion based groups, most currently in existence, violence exits for the sole purpose of guaranteeing the self preservation of their group of religious culprits in the world. Even worse is the fact that most often their acts of violence are directly related to the single biggest international security issue almost all of us in the free world must face.

In the current industrialized parts of the free world the primary religion based domestic violence culprits are the groups who are committed to Allah. When it comes to the Muslims in Canada, the USA and the European Union, nations which have for some time worked to defend personal rights thereby allowing this religion, there exists a possible national personal rights problem. This religion requires a commitment to Allah over and above a commitment to their nation and hence they as a group are a potential source of structural damages to the other political and economic sectors. It seems that some of the Muslim groups currently look even for international controls or may I say world controls. Obviously, something must be done to deal with this religion based issue and soon before it spirals out of control and ends up costing those, who are open to different cultures via true personal rights, far too much.

It therefore seems that the only way out from this improper focus of the few in the nations committed to freedom would be to make certain that they both separate themselves from their world domination focused religion and discontinue any support of non-national defense. These should be the same rules for every group of them within the applicable nation. Either that or they need to be forced out to a nation which supports their beliefs. They must do this or, even better, instead of leaving the few who do not want to be part of this violence focused group force them to change their religious beliefs whereby they will support only one of the already broken down Christian religions within these nations. The "Get out and go to one of those Muslim controlled nations" seems to be the only option as the other option which would be the same approach taken by Constantine who once thought he could end religious intolerance via the Edict of Milan in 313, which proclaimed religious toleration throughout the empire is questionable. Openness did not work for very long as it seemed every religion from that point on still wanted to eliminate the others. History should teach those who want to really learn that the desire to control others based upon religions grew in almost every nation until the last century and has not been limited to the Muslim religion. There are the Christian Protestant and Catholic religions, the Hindu, the Buddhist, as well as many other religion based groups who in history have been part of the same problem, a problem which today in the USA needs to be addressed. After studying this problem properly it has been discovered that we may actually have a way of fixing this human animal behavioral problem.


The Only Democratic Rights Option

Religious intolerance should not be allowed for any religion inside of any nation which wants to claim itself as a democracy while at the same time elimination of religion based controls would be required. To be successful in meeting this rule a general series of anti-control religion based restriction laws must be created. Hopefully for many of us this will start here in the USA. Now, these new laws must include rules whereby every member of the applicable religion can be held personally liable for the actions of any one of their group's members and this new liability must relate to any actions taken anywhere in the USA by any member within each religion based group. Just ask the following: Would it not have been better to confiscate the assets of every member of the Muslim faith in the USA (and the rest of the world's nations who want to have the same rules) instead of the rest of the America taxpayers when it came to dealing with and recovering from the Trade Tower Muslim religion based disaster? Faith rights are fine until or unless those of a specific group or groups decide to try and even take away from the others in any shape or form. So, religion believer (and non-believer) citizens of the USA decide: Would it not be best to hold every member of your faith (and non-faith) accountable for proper citizenship in order for all of you to retain your rights to the religion (and non-religion) you follow which must always be held in second place behind the personal rights of everyone in the nation? The majority in the USA would agree. Well, maybe if the Muslims in the nations committed to this change, along with the rest of the religions, support this there can be a successful continuation of all religions until they are no longer needed. That rule is one very important principle related to a real democracy.

**********************************

Please note: Those of you who find this as being a very different way to view current issues might like to also take a look at the site www.democraticroad.com. This site has many articles which are far more serious and includes one, True Freedom: The Road to the First Real Democracy, which is the first truly democratic constitution ever written along with the needed 869 page explanation.